INDEX
Introduction
Table of Contents
Policies in Process
Preliminaries
Policies
-
Legal Authority and Governance
-
University-wide
-
Presidential Area
-
Academic Affairs
-
Business Affairs
-
Student Life
-
University Advancement
-
Administrative Services
|
Evaluation of Faculty Members
Policy Statement
Since the University is responsible for maintaining high standards of
performance in a wide variety of fields, it is essential that the
faculty be composed of men and women of high personal and
professional qualifications.
The rationale of evaluation procedures is to encourage and commend
the faculty, to bring about improvement in the quality of
performance, to recognize the contributions of the individual member,
and thus to promote the excellence of the University. In addition,
this assessment serves as a basis for decisions on remuneration,
promotion, and retention.
At the end of each calendar year, faculty members are required to
submit to the appropriate dean or director a report of their faculty
activities in the areas of teaching/librarianship, research, and
service. While teaching or librarianship is considered a primary
function of the faculty, any sustained evaluation will focus on the
three faculty functions as expressed in The Teaching
Responsibility or The Librarianship Responsibility.
Teaching. Minimal qualifications for appointment or
promotion are character and the ability to teach, emotional maturity,
and personal security. Some of the elements to be evaluated are
experience; knowledge of subject matter; the capacity to organize a
course in relationship to a sequence and to an area of knowledge; the
ability to evaluate student performance, to formulate assignments,
and to construct and administer tests; skill in presentation;
interest in students; ability to stimulate youthful minds; capacity
for cooperation; and an enthusiastic devotion to teaching. The
responsibility of the teacher as a guide and friend properly extends
beyond the walls of the classroom into other phases of the life of
the student as a member of the University community. It also involves
the duty of initiating and improving educational methods both within
and outside the department.
Librarianship. Minimal qualifications for appointment
or promotion are character and the ability to perform professional
library services, emotional maturity and personal security. Some of
the elements to be evaluated are experience, knowledge of one's
area(s) of responsibility in the library, the capacity to organize
relevant resources for a subject area, the ability to evaluate the
information and scholarship needs of the Marywood University
Community as well as develop and provide access to information
resources and services, skill in presentation, interest in students,
ability to stimulate youthful minds, capacity for cooperation, and an
enthusiastic devotion to education and the library profession. The
responsibility of the librarian as a guide and friend properly
extends beyond the walls of the classroom or library into other
phases of the life of the student as a member of the University
Community. It also involves the duty of initiating and improving
informational and educational methods and services both within and
outside the library.
Scholarship and Creativity. All members of the faculty
must be persons of scholarly ability and attainments. Their
qualifications are to be evaluated on the quality of their published
and other creative work, the range and variety of their intellectual
interests, their success in training students in scholarly methods,
and their participation and leadership in professional associations
and in the editing of professional journals. Attainment may be in the
realm of scientific investigation, in the realm of constructive
contributions, or in the realm of the creative arts.
Service. The scope of the University's activities makes
it appropriate for members of the staff to engage in many activities
outside of the fields of teaching/librarianship and research. These
may include participation in committee work and other administrative
tasks, counseling, clinical duties, and special training programs.
The University also expects many of its faculty members to render
extramural services to schools, to industry, to local, state and
national agencies, and to the public at large.
Faculty contributions in each of these areas must be assessed as
objectively as possible. In order to facilitate the process, and to
assess the whole record of the faculty member, the University
utilizes a variety of means in addition to the Faculty Activities
Report, including
Self Evaluation. The best motivation to continued
improvement lies in accurate self-appraisal. Faculty members are
encouraged to utilize self-evaluation as a tool for professional
growth. They may wish to confer with the chairperson or a fellow
teacher about this evaluation, in order to improve areas of
deficiency.
Peer Evaluation. Objective judgments of peers regarding the
quality of teaching/librarianship, research, or service are an
important source of evaluative data.
Student Evaluation. The University recognizes the value and
limitations of student appraisals of faculty members. It makes use
of objective questionnaires to elicit student judgments on a
number of facets of instruction on the campus as a whole and in
regard to individual teachers.
At the end of each academic year, the department chairperson or
appropriate director will conduct an evaluation of those faculty
members serving on annual contracts in order to determine what
progress has been made in meeting the conditions for promotion and
tenure. The faculty member will be expected to submit a
self-evaluation analysis to aid the department chairperson or
director. Such data as relate to annual evaluation will become a part
of the faculty member's permanent file.
Related Policies and Committees
Policy - Qualifications
for Appointment to Rank
Policy - Promotion of
Faculty Members
Policy - Tenure
Policy - Professional Ethics
Policy - Teaching
Responsibility
Policy - Librarianship Responsibility
Policy - Core
Responsibilities of Faculty
History of the Policy
07/01/89 - Reaffirmed with publication of Faculty Manual
04/17/04 - Revision approved by the President of the University as
recommended by the Policy Committee of the University to include
faculty librarians
|