PhD: Forms, Important Dates and the Dissertation Process

    Important Dates

    SLAS P2
    The final dates to defend and submit dissertation for committees and readers are:
    Fall 2019: Dissertations must be defended no later than November 01, 2019 (Email the Program Director of your Intent to Defend no later than October 11, 2019)
    Spring 2020: Dissertations must be defended no later than April 03, 2020 (Email the Program Director of your Intent to Defend no later than March 6, 2020)
    Summer 2020: Dissertations must be defended no later than July 31, 2020 (Email the Program Director of your Intent to Defend no later than July 2, 2020)
    Fall 2020: Dissertations must be defended no later than November 06, 2020 (Email the Program Director of your Intent to Defend no later than October 2, 2020).
    Spring 2021: Dissertations must be defended no later than April 2, 2021(Email the Program Director of your Intent to Defend no later than March 5, 2021)
    Summer 2021: Dissertations must be defended no later than July 30, 2021 (Email the Program Director of your Intent to Defend no later than July 2, 2021)
    Fall 2021: Dissertations must be defended no later than November 5, 2021 (Email the Program Director your Intent to Defend no later than October 1, 2021).

    The Dissertation Stages

    PhD 1

    1. Before Starting the Dissertation Process

    2. During the Dissertation Writing Process

    • Complete at least 9 credits of dissertation research. 
    • If the dissertation has not yet been defended after satisfactory completion of 9 dissertation credits, then a continuous registration of 1 dissertation credit per academic semester is required until successful defense. 

    3. Prior to Defending the Dissertation

    • Notify the Program Director via email of your intent to defend at least one month prior to the scheduled date of your dissertation defense (no form is required). 
    • Provide an electronic copy of the dissertation three weeks prior to the scheduled defense to the Program Director and Committee members. 
    • Register for Graduation with DEAN 076 01. 
    • The Candidate and the Dissertation Committee to select two Readers at least three weeks prior to the scheduled defense date. A Reader must also hold a terminal degree from an accredited university.

    4. Defending the Dissertation

    1. The PhD Program Office will reserve a room for the dissertation defense on the selected date/time. 
    2. Dissertation defense should not be longer than 45 minutes, followed by questions and answers. 
    3. Bring a minimum of two copies of the "Dissertation Cover Page" (use the form provided in the "Forms" section of this page) to the defense. All committee members must sign the form if the dissertation defense is successful.
    4. Readers to ask questions during the defense and present their feedback to the committee.
    5. A majority vote of the Dissertation Committee members and at least one Reader is required to pass the defense.
    6. The Candidate can pass with provision that the research mentor supervise the corrections or additions to the final draft of the dissertation.
    7. Once passed, the student must submit a copy of the signed Cover Page to the Program Director and keep another copy for own record. The Cover Page may be printed (if preferred) on a Strathmore Pure Cotton, Acid free paper (Ultimate White Wove 24 lb. writing, 8.5 x 11 L 12M watermarked.  

    5. Dissertation Format

    • APA Style as described in the most current Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association is to be followed.
    • The Copyright Act of 1976 provides for statutory copyright protection for any work fixed in a tangible medium. Following the Dissertation title page, the following copyright notice should be affixed on a separate page: "© year - Author’s Name All rights reserved."
    • The left margin must be 1 1/2", the right, bottom and top margins must be 1". These margins must be respected for graphs, charts, illustrations, etc. Use font size 10-12 using the same style of font or typeface throughout.
    • Front matter may include: acknowledgements, list of illustrations or tables, glossary of terms.

    6. After Defending the Dissertation

    • Provide the Program Director with an electronic PDF copy of the completed dissertation no later than two weeks after successfully defending your dissertation.
    • If you are interested in bound copies of your dissertation you may contact Marywood University's Library.
    • Students are strongly encouraged to present their research to regional, national, or international professional audiences. Research mentors typically are also willing to assist in the development of the student’s dissertation into a manuscript for publication. In these cases, the student is to have first authorship.
    • If after two years the doctoral student does not publish his/her data, then the dissertation chair gains ownership of the data and may publish the results as first author.

    Information on Selecting a Committee

    SLAS P4

    Source: Lunenburg, F. and D. Irby. (2008). Writing a Successful Thesis or Dissertation: Tips and Strategies for Students in the Social and Behavioral Sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

    Selecting your committee is a very important step in the process of preparing your dissertation or master's thesis. The chairperson of the committee usually has broad power and influence throughout the process of completing the dissertation or master's thesis. Therefore, the selection of a chairperson for your project is a very important decision. In collaboration with your chair and committee, you will delimit your topic, develop your proposal, conduct your research, and write your dissertation or master's thesis. Ultimately, your committee will judge the quality of your project. In this chapter, we present some suggestions that might help you in selecting your dissertation or thesis chair and other committee members.

    Before choosing a faculty member as your chairperson, consider the chair's role. As mentioned previously, your chair will have broad power and influence over the dissertation or thesis process. While the specifics of this role vary from institution to institution, from department to department, and from chairperson to chairperson, some general functions of the chair are relatively universal. First, the chairperson will approve your dissertation or thesis topic. Second, the chairperson will approve, in consultation with you, the other committee members. Third, the chairperson will approve every line, section, and chapter of the dissertation. Fourth, the chairperson will determine how committee members will be involved in the dissertation or thesis process. Fifth, the chairperson will decide when you are ready to defend your dissertation or master's thesis. And, ultimately, the chairperson will determine whether you will be granted the degree.

    Most departments have rules concerning who may and who may not serve as dissertation or thesis chairpersons. Some universities allow only those individuals who are on the graduate faculty to serve as dissertation chairs; that is, faculty who have adequate, recent publication records and who teach graduate classes. These rules are based on the rationale that faculty who do not have active programs of research will lack the necessary skills to guide a doctoral research project. Rules regarding who may chair master's theses may not be as stringent as those concerning doctoral dissertations. Because practice varies on who may and who may not serve as dissertation chairs, we recommend that you learn your institution's rules as soon as possible. Knowing your institution's local ground rules will help you avoid considering a potential chairperson who is not eligible to chair a dissertation or thesis.

    You must consider the following factors in choosing a chair: (a) expertise, (b) accessibility, (c) feedback, (d) success, (e) personality style, and (f) attitudes toward methodology. The importance of each one will be discussed in turn.

    Expertise Ideally, it is in your best interest to find a chair with expertise in your topic area. You may want to read some of your potential chair's publications. In our opinion, following this advice generally will produce a better product. Obviously, the closer your chair's area of expertise is to your topic, the more competent he or she will be to (a) identify difficulties you may encounter as you proceed with your study, (b) direct you toward literature sources pertinent to your topic, and (c) guide your choice of methods for collecting and analyzing data. Furthermore, a chair who has an interest and competence in your topic area is likely to be more invested in your project; that is, think through the project more fully and keep a vigilant eye on your progress than one who is not knowledgeable about your topic area, and, therefore, may lack interest in it as well.

    Accessibility Another important factor to consider in selecting a chair is accessibility. Several things can interfere with a chair being consistently accessible to you during the life of your project. When considering someone as a possible chair, you should think about these things. Nationally known scholars may be too busy with their own research activity to give you the time you need. Other faculty may have active clinical practices or be away from campus frequently due to consulting commitments. Faculty members who have nine-month contracts with the university may not be available during the summer. Faculty who are planning a sabbatical leave may potentially interrupt your progress. Another faculty member may be planning to take a position in another university and, therefore, may not be available during the progress of your project. One of the authors of this book had her chair go on sabbatical leave during the final semester of her dissertation work; therefore, a new chair had to be appointed. Popular chairs may have an excessive number of dissertations or theses to monitor, because they are in high demand.

    Then there is the issue of tenure. Whereas nontenured faculty contracts may not be renewed, tenured faculty members are likely to be more stable. You will need to consider the relative accessibility and stability of potential chairs, along with your own time constraints and projections for completion.

    Feedback Typically, the chair provides the first line of quality control for the dissertation or thesis. And usually the chair will approve the proposal and final version of the project before you will be permitted to forward chapters of the dissertation or thesis to other committee members. Therefore, look for a chair with a reputation for reading, critiquing, and returning written drafts promptly.

    What is a good turnaround time? A good rule of thumb is to allow two weeks for a response. After that, a tactful inquiry may be appropriate. Obviously, students should recognize that it might take longer during very busy periods (e.g., end of grading periods, holidays, and before graduation deadlines when all students want to finish their projects).

    You should balance timelines of response with the thoroughness with which the potential chairperson reads submitted material. Some chairs provide vague feedback (e.g., rewrite this section), while others may provide detailed comments (e.g., "You need to identify the three main factors and then evaluate them in light of the theories you have discussed."). Waiting longer for a chapter to be returned by a chair may have some positive consequences. First, if you satisfy a chair who provides a thorough critique of your work, you are less likely to encounter serious problems with other committee members. Second, you will be better prepared for your proposal defense and final oral defense of your dissertation or thesis. Third, once you have satisfied your chair's standards, he or she is more likely to support you if one of your other committee members becomes overly or unreasonably critical of your work.

    Success Success at bringing students to graduation is an important factor to consider when selecting a chair. Because you are concerned with completing your degree, count how many successful students your potential chair has; that is, what percentage of the chair's students finish their degrees. Consider that criterion cautiously because some faculty members may not have had the opportunity to chair doctoral dissertations or master's theses.

    Personality Styles Personality styles matter to some people. Writing a dissertation or thesis is a collaborative process between you and your chairperson. Obviously, you want a chair with whom you can work reasonably well. You will need to assess the match between what you expect from your chair and your chair's notion of the best way to perform his or her role.

    Chairpersons vary greatly in how they work with students on dissertations and theses. Those at one end of the continuum closely monitor each phase of the students' work, in some cases stipulating exactly what is to be done at every step, and then require the student to submit each section of material for critique. Chairs at the other end of the continuum tell students to progress on their own and to finish a complete draft of the project before submitting it for evaluation. Most chairs will probably fall somewhere between these two extremes. Chairpersons also differ in the way they provide criticism. Some are blunt and even derisive. Others are direct and kindly in critiquing students' work. Still others are so cautious of students' feeling when pointing out weaknesses that they fail to guide their students in correcting deficiencies. In the latter case, someone else on the committee will have to step up and perform that duty; for the role of the chair and committee is to ensure that the candidate has met the university, college, and department standards.

    Students also have personal preferences with whom they want to work, in general. For example, some students prefer to work with female faculty members, while others prefer to work with male faculty. Some students prefer to work with older people, while others prefer younger faculty.

    Attitudes Toward Methodology Faculty members often differ concerning their preferences for a particular research method. A research method comprises the strategy followed in collecting and analysing data. The major distinction in classifying research by method is the distinction between quantitative and qualitative research. Quantitative and qualitative research can be broken down further into several distinct types, each designed to answer a different kind of research question. Quantitative research involves the collection and analysis of numerical data, which are usually rendered in the form of statistics. Advocates of quantitative studies tend to prefer such types as descriptive (or survey), correlational, causal-comparative, and experimental research. Proponents of such studies claim that their work is done from within a value-free framework.

    Qualitative research involves mostly nonnumerical data, such as extensive notes taken at a research site, interview data, videotape and audiotape recordings, and other nonnumerical artifacts. Qualitative researchers stress the socially constructed nature of reality, the intimate relationship between the researcher and the participant, and the situational constraints that shape inquiry. Qualitative researchers emphasize the value-laden nature of inquiry. Proponents of qualitative studies tend to favor such research approaches as case study, ethnography, ethology, ethnomethodology, grounded theory, phenomenology, symbolic interaction, and historical research.

    You need to examine the match between your preference and your potential chair's preference for a research method. Many faculty members accept both quantitative and qualitative research methods, including the authors of this text. We believe that the issue is not which method is better, but rather which method (quantitative, qualitative, or mixed methods) will best answer the particular research question or direction of inquiry.

    Information on Defending

    PhD 3

    According to Foss and Waters (2007), the dissertation defense begins as soon as you start working on your dissertation. Defense in the context of the dissertation process refers to the presenting, explaining and defending of your ideas. It also includes laying out the rationale behind your choices and decisions, for example, regarding theory selection and research methods. Efforts to recruit your chair and other committee members will entail some of this communication behavior. Seeking approval for your dissertation proposal, the foundation of all your research activities, will also entail a bit of defense.

    Throughout the process many exchanges with your chair and other committee members will involve explaining and defending your ideas and decision. However, the most important event is the actual dissertation defense which comes at the end of a long and arduous process and which may have unfolded over a number of years. The dissertation defense is a significant milestone signaling closure on your graduate student career.

    The dissertation defense can be divided into three distinct components the preparation, the defense, and follow-up. 

    PREPARATION:

    • Attend the defenses of some of your colleagues.
    • It is very important to adhere to the program's rules, required forms and deadlines covering the scheduling of a defense.
    • Begin very early to schedule and coordinate the date, time and place for the defense. Committee members and chairs have very busy schedules.
    • Have your manuscript reviewed before the defense to be sure it is consistent with APA formatting requirements. You want to present a polished document for the committee in preparation for the defense.
    • Maximize your opportunity in the pre-defense meeting to raise any issues or concerns. Ask your chair and committee members what questions and issues might be raised during the defense. Prepare to address them.
    • Organize your material for presentation. Create flawless presentation of the material you will be covering on the defense. Finally, time yourself and practice presenting the material and answering questions.

    DEFENSE MEETING:

    • Meetings may begin with brief comments by the chair, introducing you and members of the committee and setting up a timeline and procedure for the presentation and follow up questions.
    • Your presentation material should briefly cover the research question, literature review as it relates to your theory, methods and analysis, major findings and recommendations for future research.
    • Do not read the PowerPoint or from a prepared paper (you may glance at a short note as a guide). Maintain eye contact, be clear, calm, confidant, and charming. 
    • Avoid jargons, repetition, and editorial comments.Maintain an academic quality both in content and presentation.
    • During the defense, the committee may take turns asking you questions and discussing among themselves points of interest or disagreement.
    • Some questions to anticipate include identifying the weaknesses of your study and post-dissertation research plans.
    • No Readers are required. However, the Dissertation Committee Chair may appoint up to two non-voting Readers who can ask questions and present their feedback to the Dissertation Committee. 
    • When all questions have been asked and answered, everyone (including the defending student, readers, staff, administrators, family, friends, guests and the public) will be asked to leave the room while the Dissertation Committee deliberates. At this time the committee will be deciding by vote whether to pass you on your defense and dissertation.
    • The desired outcome of this meeting is the chair's greeting you with the statement "Congratulations, Dr....... The defense was successful and the committed has passed your dissertation."
    • Have your committee sign two copies of the Cover Page of your dissertation on an acid-free paper. Keep one copy and submit the other to the Program Director. 

    POST DEFENSE:

    • You may plan a small reception for friends and family.
    • Attend to the revisions the committee asked you make during the due period.
    • Provide PDF copies of your work to your chair, committee members, Program Director, family and friends. You may also provide bound copies to your library. 

    Overall, the dissertation defense process includes the following ten steps (Lantsoght, 2014):

    1. Know your committee
      2. Know your assumptions and limitations of your conclusions
      3. Prepare Effective PowerPoint Presentation 
      4. Prepare for questions that are right at the edge of your dissertation
      5. Trust yourself
      6. Brush up on your literature knowledge
      7. Know your schedule for the Big Day
      8. Eat well
      9. Get enough sleep
      10. Enjoy your big day

    Resources

    Foss, S. and W. Waters. (2007). Destination Dissertation: A Traveler's Guide to a Done Dissertation. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield, Inc. 

    Lantsoght, E. (2014). The A-Z of the PhD Trajectory. NY: springer.

    Sample of Alumni Dissertation Titles

    SLAS P1

    "Two roads diverged in a wood, and I—
    I took the one less traveled by,
    And that has made all the difference."  (Robert Frost)

    2019

    Kenneth Luck

    • Dissertation Title: Emergence of Conspiratorial Ideas and Big Data: A Google N-gram Viewer Quantitative Analysis of Historical Trends from 1900 to 2008. 
    • Dissertation Committee Chair: Dr. Deborah Hokien 

    Leon John

    • Dissertation Title: Self-Efficacy among Students of Color at Predominantly White Institutions of Higher Education in Northeastern Pennsylvania. 
    • Dissertation Committee Chair: Dr. Maria Montoro-Edwards 

    Yerodin Lucas

    • Dissertation Title: Factors Affecting Black Male Student Persistence to Earning a Baccalaureate Degree at Predominantly White Institutions in Northeastern Pennsylvania.
    • Dissertation Committee Chair: Dr. Adam Shiprintzen

    Cynthia LaRosa

    • Dissertation Title: Mental Health and Public Secondary School Students: Perceptions of School Administrators in a Public School Setting
    • Dissertation Committee Chair: Dr. Patricia Arter 

    Kimberlee Jennings-Heckman

    • Dissertation Title: Use of Principles to Increase Preparedness of Special Education Teachers in the Education of Students Diagnosed with Emotional Disturbance Disabilities
    • Dissertation Committee Chair: Dr. Alan Levine

    Tara Lopatofsky

    • Dissertation Title: The Perceived Impact of Post-Secondary Education Program on Kenyan Catholic Sisters' Understanding of their Lives as Women Religious: A Case Study
    • Dissertation Committee Chair: Dr. Diane Keller

    Matthew Hill

    • Dissertation Title: “Self-Regulated Learning and Ninth Grade Reading”

    Jennifer Elizabeth Welgosh

    • Dissertation Title: “Women’s Perceptions of Workplace Sexual Harassment: A Phenomenological Study”
    • Dissertation Committee Chair: Dr. Joseph Polizzi

    Dorothy June Grill

    • Dissertation Title: “Vanquishing the Labyrinth: Reframing a Future with Androgynous Authentic Nonprofit Women Leaders”

    Linda Denz

    • Dissertation Title: Effects of Self-Care Practices and Personal and Occupational Variables on Compassion Satisfaction, Burnout, Secondary Traumatic Stress, and Compassion Fatigue in Hospice Nurses.
    • Dissertation Committee Chair: Sister Gail Cabral.

    Diana Bixby

    • Dissertation Title: The Future of Zero Tolerance and/or Exclusionary Discipline Policies: Perceptions from the Front Line.
    • Dissertation Chair: Dr. Alan Levine.

    Kelley McConnell 

    • Dissertation Title:Teacher Attitudes and Beliefs on the Socialization of Cyber School Students.
    • Dissertation Committee Chair: Dr. Alan Levine.

    David Schweitzer

    • Dissertation Title: "Differences in Quality of Life Among College Students in Northeastern Pennsylvania: The Role of Family Structure and Parental Conflict." 
    • Dissertation Committee Chair: Dr. Tracie Pasold.

    Tiffany Mulally

    • Dissertation Title: an Examination of Exposure Risk, Gender Equality, and Household Responsibility Predicting the Equity of Bicycle Use in Active Transportation.
    • Dissertation Committee Chair: Dr. Alan Levine.

    2018

    Stanley J. Kania III

    • Dissertation Title: The Use of Social Media and E-Marketing Practices in Graduate Student Recruitment: An Investigation of Graduate Enrollment Management Practices.
    • Dissertation Committee Chair: Dr. Allan Levine 

    Joseph Cice

    • Dissertation Committee Chair: Dr. Deborah Hokien

    2017

    Jeffrey Attick

    • Dissertation Title:The Process and Practice of Transformative Learning in an International Education Context
    • Dissertation Committee Chair: Dr. Joseph Polizzi

    Tanya Carrelle

    • Dissertation Title:The Hidden Cost of Special Education Due Process
    • Dissertation Committee Chair: Dr. Patricia Arter

    Erin Dunleavy

    • Dissertation Title:Empathy During the Third Year Clerkship: A Crossover Study of a Traditional Block and a Longitudinal Integrative Clerkship Experience
    • Dissertation Committee Chair: Dr. Brooke Cannon

    Sandra Kerstetter

    • Dissertation Title:Healthcare Excellence and Clinician Characteristics
    • Dissertation Committee Chair: Dr. Alice Elaine McDonnell

    Meagan Mielczarek

    • Dissertation Title:Rape Myth Acceptance in High Education: A Quantitative Study of Faculty, Staff, and Administration at Two Religiously Affiliated Schools Located in Northeast Pennsylvania
    • Dissertation Committee Chair: Dr. Deborah Hokien

    Mark Shaffer

    • Dissertation Title:The Experiences of African American Studies at Predominantly White Institutions
    • Dissertation Committee Chair: Kerri Tobin

    Amanda Silva

    • Dissertation Title:Women Living History: A Case Study Exploring Persona, Transformative Learning, and Social Identity in Group Participation
    • Dissertation Committee Chair: Dr. Joseph Polizzi

    Katherine Stefanelli

    • Dissertation Title:The Effect of Guided Meditation on Chronic Stress and Health-Related Quality of Life in Millennial Generation Students
    • Dissertation Committee Chair: Dr. Tonya Saddler

    Teresa Tulaney

    • Dissertation Title:The Life of a Nurse: An Instrumental Case Study on Lateral Violence in Nursing
    • Dissertation Committee Chair: Dr. Marie Bonavoglia

    2016 

    Joanne Bohrman

    • Dissertation Title:Transcending Minority Trust Boundaries in a Multicultural School Community: An AutoEthnography
    • Dissertation Committee Chair: Dr. Joseph Polizzi

    Kelly Carroll

    • Dissertation Title:Self-Efficacy in Behavior Management and Discipline and Psychological Type Among Secondary Education Teachers and Alternative Education Teachers
    • Dissertation Committee Chair: Dr. Alan Levine

    Kimberly Fetter

    • Dissertation Title:The Relationship Between Professional Development and Perceived Teacher Efficacy in Practicing School Teachers in Grades Kindergarten Through Twelve
    • Dissertation Committee Chair: Dr. Gail Cabral

    James Feuerstein

    • Dissertation Title:Predicting Underachievement in Middle School Gifted Students Utilizing the SAAS-R
    • Dissertation Committee Chair: Kerri Tobin

    Lisa Imbriaco

    • Dissertation Title:Factors Impacting College Students in Managing Credit Card Debt
    • Dissertation Committee Chair: Dr. Arthur Comstock

    Margaret Ptakowski

    • Dissertation Title:The Significance of Professional Development as Perceived, Accessed, and Used by Early Childhood Teachers in Nine Northeastern Pennsylvania Early Childhood Centers
    • Dissertation Committee Chair: Dr. Christine Fryer

    Melissa Heinlein Storti

    • Dissertation Title:Are Volunteer Resource Managers Experiencing Dimensions of Burnout? An Exploratory Study
    • Dissertation Committee Chair: Dr. Diane Keller

    Helene Strutko

    • Dissertation Title:General Education and Special Education Teachers' Perceptions of the Co-Teaching Experience in a Career and Technology High School in Northeast Pennsylvania
    • Dissertation Committee Chair: Dr. Tammy Brown

    Mark Wade

    • Dissertation Title: How Well Do Emotional Intelligence, Discipline, Gender, Race and Socioeconomic Status Predict Academic Achievement of Secondary School Students in Northeast Pennsylvania?
    • Dissertation Committee Chair: Dr. Maria Montoro Edwards

    David Wright

    • Dissertation Title:  Predictors of Performance on Fourth Grade State Science Assessments in Eastern Pennsylvania: Guided Inquiry-Based Science Instruction and Direct Textbook-Based Science Instruction
    • Dissertation Committee Chair: Dr. Christine Fryer

    2015 

    Christina Bracey

    • Dissertation Title:How Practicing Teachers Identify and Address Ethical Dilemmas
    • Dissertation Committee Chair: Dr. Joseph Polizzi

    Matthew Caputo

    • Dissertation Title:Factors Influencing Seasonal Influenza Vaccination Uptake Rate Among Undergraduate College Students in Scranton
    • Dissertation Committee Chair: Dr. Deborah Hokien

    April Hortman

    • Dissertation Title: Self-Identified Multi-Racial Individuals: A Quantitative Exploration of the Effects of Racial Category Choices on Collective Self-Esteem and Perceived Discrimination
    • Dissertation Committee Chair: Dr. Lloyd Lyter

    Elizabeth McGill

    • Dissertation Title:Predictors of Bullying Victimization on a College Campus
    • Dissertation Committee Chair: Dr. Francis DeMatteo

    Rachel Francis

    • Dissertation Title:The Effect of a Yoga Therapy Program Among Cancer Patients: An Analysis of Personal, Psychological, and Economic Impacts
    • Dissertation Committee Chair: Lori Swanchak

    Ronald Hollm

    • Dissertation Title:Predictors of Tobacco Reduction With Non-Treatment Seeking 18 to 24 Year Old Tobacco Users
    • Dissertation Committee Chair: Dr. Lloyd Lyter

    April Hortman

    • Dissertation Title:Self-Identified Multi-Racial Individuals: A Quantitative Exploration of the Effects of Racial Category Choices on Collective Self-Esteem and Perceived Discrimination
    • Dissertation Committee Chair: Dr. Lloyd Lyter

    Heather LaBarre

    • Dissertation Title:Understanding the Development of Cultural Competence for BSW Students: An Examination of Social Construction and Classroom Experience
    • Dissertation Committee Chair: Dr. Lloyd Lyter

    Rodeen Lechleitner

    • Dissertation Title:A Cross-Sectional Study Assessing Home Health Nurses' Communication From a Therapeutic and Caring Perspective
    • Dissertation Committee Chair: Dr. Alice McDonnell

    John Lichtenwalner

    • Dissertation Title:Factors That Influence Web 2.0 Usage Among Social Work Faculty: A Quantitative Study
    • Dissertation Committee Chair: Dr. Diane Keller

    Elizabeth McGill

    • Dissertation Title:Predictors of Bullying Victimization on a College Campus
    • Dissertation Committee Chair: Dr. Francis DeMatteo

    Judith Rex

    • Dissertation Title:Exploring the Factors of Resilience, Health-Promoting Behaviors and Job Satisfaction Predicting Retention Among Pennsylvania Primary Nurse Aide Instructors
    • Dissertation Committee Chair: Dr. Lee Harrison

    Sara Beth Rothenberger

    • Dissertation Title:The Relationships Between Perceptions of Feedback Utility, Procedural Justice and Quality of Teacher and Supervisor Interpersonal Interactions in Teacher Evaluations
    • Dissertation Committee Chair: Dr. Jennifer Barna

    Arianne Scheller

    • Dissertation Title: Perceived Parenting, Self-Efficacy, and Parental Smoking: Effects on Adolescent Smoking Initiation
    • Dissertation Committee Chair: Dr. Shamshad Ahmed

    Elizabeth Sechler

    • Dissertation Title:Social Entrepreneurship in Housing and Residence Life Organizations
    • Dissertation Committee Chair: Dr. Robert Shaw

    Craig Robert Skaluba

    • Dissertation Title:Transition Into School Leadership: The Influence of Perceived Interpersonal Communication Competence on Perceived Stress, Perceived Coping Abilities, and Beginning Experiences of the Principalship
    • Dissertation Committee Chair: Dr. Gail Cabral

    Renee Gregori Zehel

    • Dissertation Title:The Influence of Financial Aid and Student Engagement on Young Alumni Giving
    • Dissertation Committee Chair: Dr. Alan Levine

    2014 

    Mark Choman

    • Dissertation Title:A Grounded Theory Study to Explore World Adoption Concerns and Experiences at Institutions of Higher Education
    • Dissertation Committee Chair: Dr. Alan Levine

    Susan Elczyna

    • Dissertation Title:The Incidence of Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction in the Elderly Population Receiving General Anesthesia For Short Stay Surgery
    • Dissertation Committee Chair: Dr. Alice Elaine McDonnell

    Meaghan Ruddy Godwin

    • Dissertation Title:Transformative Learning in Graduate Medical Education
    • Dissertation Committee Chair: Dr. Joseph Polizzi

    Heather Renee Hall

    • Dissertation Title:Spiritual Growth of Students at Baptist Bible Colleges
    • Dissertation Committee Chair: Sr. Mary Salvaterra

    Jennifer Hertwig

    • Dissertation Title: Psychological Type & Multiple Intelligence Profiles of Secondary Students in Pennsylvania Approved Alternative Schools
    • Dissertation Committee Chair: Dr. Alan Levine

    Benjamin David Ivey

    • Dissertation Title: Priming for Improved Attention to Auditory Social Stimuli in Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorders
    • Dissertation Committee Chair: Dr. Vijay Ramachandra

    Eugene R. Kelly

    • Dissertation Title: Conformity to Masculine Gender Norms as Predictors of Subtle Rape Myth Belief
    • Dissertation Committee Chair: Dr. C. Estelle Campenni

    Rodeen Leichleitner

    • Dissertation Title: A Cross-Sectional Study Assessing Home Health Nurses' Communication from a Therapeutic and Caring Perspective
    • Dissertation Committee Chair: Dr. Alice Elaine McDonnell

    Beth Taylor Mack

    • Dissertation Title:Health Behaviors of Extreme Commuters: A Phenomenological Study
    • Dissertation Committee Chair: Dr. Lloyd Lyter

    Beverly M. McNamara

    • Dissertation Title: High Risk Students: Why Do They Persist in Completing Their High School Education?
    • Dissertation Committee Chair: Sr. Kathryn Clauss

    William Fred Miller

    • Dissertation Title: An Exploration of the Impact of Barriers to Nurse Practitioners Working in Primary Care: A Descriptive Study
    • Dissertation Committee Chair: Dr. Alice Elaine McDonnell

    Erin A. Murray

    • Dissertation Title: The Perceptions of Behavioral Health Workers on Co-Occurring Disorders: A Quantitative Analysis
    • Dissertation Committee Chair: Dr. Lloyd Lyter

    Jamie Lynn Valis

    • Dissertation Title: Physical Activity Differences for Individuals With Disabilities in a National Sample of U.S. College Students
    • Dissertation Committee Chair: Dr. Michelle Gonzalez