IRB Policies and Procedures
Policies & Procedures
- An Overview
- Application Process and Deadlines
- Board Authority and Composition
- Board Determinations
- Closure or Withdrawal
- Continuing Review
- Deception or Incomplete Disclosure
- Definitions
- Departmental Review Boards
- Dietary Supplements
- Exempt Review
- Expedited Review
- Full Review
- General Data Protection Regulation
- Incentives in Research
- Informed Consent and Assent
- International Research
- Mandatory Reporting
- Mandatory Training
- Misconduct
- Non-English Speaking Participants
- Oral History and Journalism
- Prisoner Research
- Records Retention
- Recruitment of Participants
- Reproductive Risk in Clinical Research
- Research Advisors
- Responsibilities of Investigators and Sponsors
- Revisions to Approved Research
- Separation of Principal Investigators
- Student Research
- Suspension or Termination
- Whistleblower Policy
Closure or Withdrawal
Purpose
The purpose is to outline the policies and procedures for closure or withdrawal of human research projects.
Definitions
Closure of a research project is an official action taken by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) or Exempt Review Committee (ERC) to finalize its IRBNet history and to set a date of destruction for all electronic and hard copy records maintained by the Office of Planning and Institutional Research (OPIE).
De-identification means the removal or separation of any and all data points that help establish or indicate an individual, or any other unique items of individually identifying information, from data or specimens.
Identifiable biospecimen is a biospecimen for which the identity of the subject is or may be readily ascertained by the investigator or associated with the information.
Identifiable private information occurs when the identity of the subject is or may readily be ascertained by the investigator or associated with the information:
- If subjects' identities are inseparable from data, then data are directly
- If subjects' identities are kept separate from data, with information connecting them maintained by a code or a master list, then data are indirectly
- Research data or records which retain indirect identifiers only are still considered identifiable.
Identifiers are data points that help establish or indicate an individual and may include items such as (1) name; (2) address; (3) elements of dates related to an individual (e.g., date of birth); (4) email address; (5) numbers, such as telephone/fax, social security, medical record, health plan/beneficiary, certificate/license, vehicle identifiers (e.g., license plate), accounts (e.g., bank/credit card), device ID/serial; (6) web URLs; (7) Internet Protocol (IP) addresses; (8) biometric identifiers (e.g., voice, fingerprints); (9) full face photographs or comparable images; (10) or any other unique identifying number, characteristic or code not assigned by the investigator for coding purposes (e.g., Global Positioning System readings).
- Some data points may not appear identifiable in and of themselves, but may be combined to create new data that may be identifiable (e.g., person over 85 in a singular zip code; combination of birth date with a zip code, many demographics with small sample size, etc.).
Withdrawal of a research project is a specific type of closure which is requested by a Principal Investigator (PI) or automatically made by the IRB or ERC under certain circumstances (i.e., project abandoned before approval, or approved but never implemented).
Policy
Principal Investigators (PIs) are responsible for informing the IRB or ERC when their research has been completed or abandoned. A research protocol is considered to be open and active until the investigator has submitted a Closure Form through IRBNet (www.irbnet.org). When it remains open, the IRB or ERC notifies investigators at least annually following the initial approval. At these notification intervals, investigators must submit a Closure Report, unless research activities will continue (see our Continuing Review policy).
Investigators must complete the Closure Form and submit it to the IRB or ERC within thirty (30) days of completion of the research. No closure documentation is required for projects determined to be Not Human Subject Research.
The research project may be closed when ALL of the following apply:
- All subject recruitment and enrollment has been completed (i.e., no advertising or consent process remains).
- All subject data, records or specimens have been obtained (i.e., no further collection from or about living individuals)
- No further contact with enrolled subjects is necessary
- Analysis of subject identifiable data, records, or specimens is complete
If the only remaining activity is analysis of de-identified data, the research project may be closed. However, the investigator must explain exactly how the data are no longer identifiable so that closure may be considered.
Advisors of student investigators are responsible for ensuring that a Closure Form is filed with the IRB or ERC in a timely fashion.
Separation of PI
PIs who terminate employment or other association with Marywood University are responsible for submitting a Closure Form, unless another action is appropriate (see our Separation policy).
Administrative Closures
The IRB or ERC may administratively close a project within six (6) months of submission if a package remains incomplete without response, within six (6) months of a determination if a PI is unresponsive to board requests, after the conclusion of research courses when approved projects are not officially closed by student investigators, or as otherwise appropriate.
Procedures
Closure
- Upon conclusion of the research, the PI completes and submits a closure form to the appropriate board through IRBNet (www.irbnet.org), reporting the results and current state of records.
- If not closed within ninety (90) days of the one-year anniversary or expiration date, IRBNet generates and sends an automated e-mail message to the PI and all who have been granted full project access, and if no response is received, repeats the messages at 60/30/10 days prior to the date, as well as one day after, as a prompt for the PI to submit the closure report. A staff member attempts contact to follow-up whenever possible.
- A staff member reviews the submission. Unless there are questions, the project is marked as closed in the IRBNet system, and the expiration or report due date is deleted to halt automated reminders (Note: This date will still exist in the approval letter).
- Upon closure, a staff member marks the protocol’s records as closed in the appropriate database. The staff member moves the protocol file (IRB only) from the active filing cabinet and stores it in the closed filing cabinet. Records are stored for the minimum time required by regulations and/or contracts, after which they are destroyed. IRBNet purges records every January 1 after the destruction date.
- In scenarios described above under Administrative Closures, a staff member attempts contact within the mentioned time frames. If no response is received after a reasonable time and effort, the staff member administratively closes the project under steps 3 and 4.
Withdrawal
- If a PI decides to abandon a project prior to final approval, or after approval but before implementation, he/she submits a closure report to the appropriate board through IRBNet (www.irbnet.org), marking withdrawal and stating the reason.
- A staff member reviews the submission. Unless there are questions, the project is marked as withdrawn/closed in the IRBNet system.
Related Policies
- Approval of Research
- Continuing Review
- Mandatory Reporting
- Records Retention
- Separation of Principal Investigators
- Suspension or Termination
History
07/19/2013 - Created
10/24/2014 - Updated (De-identified Data)
12/05/2014 - Updated (Clarification on De-identified Data Reporting for Closure)
06/13/2017 - Corrected references to office name; updated formatting and related policies; updated procedures
07/05/2019 - Updated as a result of the Revised Common Rule